Skip to content

Here’s Swedish LENR company Neofire

This post was originally published on Animpossibleinvention.com


 

Peter Björkbom -- photo: Mats Lewan.

Peter Björkbom — photo: Mats Lewan.

Apart from the well-known companies with LENR based technology, such as Andrea Rossi’s partner company Industrial Heat, and Brillouin Energy, founded by Robert Godes, there are a series of small rather unknown companies that have popped out in the last few years.

One of them is Swedish Neofire that surfaced in February 2015. It turns out to be founded in 2010 and run by one single person – Peter Björkbom – whom I came to talk with at ICCF-19 in Padua last week.

 

 

Read more on Animpossibleinvention.com

What to learn from an historical cold fusion conference — ICCF19

This post was originally published on Animpossibleinvention.com.


 

iccf19-logoLast week, the international conference cold fusion, ICCF-19, was held, and I would argue it was historical, for several reasons.

The first is the ongoing trial by Rossi’s and his US partner Industrial Heat of a commercially implemented 1 MW thermal power plant based on the E-Cat. From credible sources I get confirmation of what Rossi states — that the plant is running very well — which means that we should expect important results presented at the end of the 400 day trial, backed up by a customer who certifies the useful power output and the measured electrical input from the grid. Such results will be difficult to challenge.

Read more on Animpossibleinvention.com.

Will LENR reach mass adoption faster than any other tech?

This post was originally posted on Animpossibleinvention.com and on E-Cat World.


earthYou often hear that new technologies spread to reach global mass adoption at an ever increasing speed — from electricity, telephones, radio and television to PCs, mobile phones and the web.

The hypothesis seems accurate and also reasonable, given that the world is getting increasingly connected in several ways, both with regard to communications, transportation and commerce, but it’s actually not correct.

(Read more)

 

Time to dispel the streetlight paradox of energy

This blog post was originally posted on Animpossibleinvention.com.


 

streetlight_jokeThe current development in LENR, where things seem to be moving fast towards confirmation of a new energy source, could finally open a way to dispel what I call the streetlight paradox of energy.

It’s about time.

You’ve probably heard the joke about the drunkard who is searching under a streetlight for something he lost…

Read more here.

 

It seems big banks know about cold fusion

(This blog post was originally posted on Animpossibleinvention.com).


 

The oil price keeps falling. And most analysts seem convinced that they know the reason — it’s about supply, or demand, or Putin, or Saudi Arabia, or Syria or…

But what if it were something completely different, known only by top people at the world’s biggest banks. And you. That a new, clean and basically infinite energy source might replace oil (and gas, coal and nuclear).

Torkel Nyberg, who runs the blog Sifferkoll.se, has studied this hypothesis for several years. And half a year ago he got what looks like a smoking gun.

(Read more at Animpossibleinvention.com).

Replication attempts are heating up cold fusion

(This blog post was first published on Animpossibleinvention.com).


The reactor used by Alexander Parkhomov.

The reactor used by Alexander Parkhomov.

In just a few weeks, the whole landscape of cold fusion and LENR has changed significantly and, as many have noted, 2015 might bring a breakthrough for LENR in general, with increased public awareness, scientific acceptance and maybe even commercial applications. This is great news.

For those who haven’t followed the latest events, let me summarize.

Most important is the apparent replication of the E-Cat phenomenon by the Russian scientist Alexander Parkhomov. On December 25, 2014, Parkhomov, a respected and experienced physicist, published a short report on an experiment where he had used a reactor similar to the one used by the Swedish-Italian group in the Lugano experiment with Rossi’s E-Cat, and with similar materials in the fuel.

This kind of replication, based on the information in the Lugano report, was what I predicted in the second edition of my book.

Read more on Animpossibleinvention.com.

Unconditional basic income might be a brilliant idea

Dollar-NoteWhy would anyone suggest a basic income for everyone, and by the way, would it even be a good idea? Well, here you go:

Several studies indicate that machines will be able to to a large part of the jobs humans do today within a few decades, and looking at technology such as the digital assistant Amelia developed by IP Soft, it’s not hard to see that this is starting to happen already now.

One main issue for the society to deal with will be how to distribute wealth to people, when the model of salary-for-work will be broken. I invite policy makers, economists and others to start discussing this immediately since we will run into difficulties sooner than most people think.

So far, few new models have been proposed. One of them is a basic income for all citizens, which at first look could seem a weak solution. Most people would probably dismiss the idea intuitively and say that it wouldn’t work.

It turns out, however, that recent real world experiments show the opposite! In this video, Federico Pistono, author of the book ‘Robots Will Steal Your Job, but That’s Ok’, talks about some hugely interesting results from studies of Unconditional Basic Income.

In a randomized trial in rural India, where 12,000 people were given an unconditional basic income for 18 months, results were unambiguously positive in all ways.

For this to happen, there were some important conditions.

– The income must be basic, i.e. it must cover basic needs. In this case about 24 dollars per family per week.

– It must be distributed to everyone individually, also to children and elderly, though children below the age of about seven could have their income managed by the parents.

– It must be unconditional. No strings attached, such as ‘you need to buy food’ or ‘you need to bring children to school’. Every such condition costs money for control and increases the possibility of corruption. Just let people decide what to do with the money.

So what were the results? Look here:

– The adoption to receive the income was 93% after one month (after a few weeks people needed to have a bank account which turned out not to be a problem).

– Even though everyone received a basic income, labor, productivity and work increased.

– All measurable social indicators were better than in a control group without unconditional basic income.

– The total cost of the program was less than keeping existing social programs.

– People were twice as likely to have increased their productivity at work, they increased their livestock by 70% and they were more likely to increase income from work.

– There was a significant reduction in indebtedness, and an increase in savings.

– People were spending more on transport to school and they were more likely to improve their house, supply of clean water etc.

– There was an improvement in children’s weight for age and this was more pronounced for girls.

– People had more varied diets, and they were NOT more likely than others to spend on private bads such as alcohol or tobacco.

– And FINALLY: People were three times as likely to start a new business or production activity as others!

Or as Pistono puts it:

‘The moment you don’t have to worry about money for survival, that is the moment when you can use social your social capital and your intelligence to actually start something meaningful.’

One important aspect of this is that many people might choose to do voluntary work or other activities that are not considered ‘profitable’ in our society today. Decoupling income from work actually seems to liberate large amounts of activity, but it’s hard to believe since most of us have a strong feeling that if we’re not productive, we’re not entitled to an income.

On the other hand, from a larger perspective you could ask what it is to be productive. Productive for whom? For your employer, or… for humanity and the world?

Several other studies confirm the results from India, Pistono reports. Most of them have been done in the last few years, and in India there are now plans for a large scale study in 1,000 villages.

Meanwhile, a referendum for unconditionally basic income of about 2,500 euros is planned for in Switzerland (although it’s not obvious that the results from a country like India can be translated to a western rich country).

In the end you could ask this question: Why do we do anything (except basic needs such as eat, sleep reproduce)?

You could search for the answer at many levels. My answer is at the deepest existential level: The property to develop and move ahead seems in-built in every single part of the Universe, and it’s an intrinsic part of us.

This is the force that makes everything in the Universe self-organize, that have made particles form atoms and molecules, that made the DNA molecule to form and life to appear, and that can be observed in ourselves through the fact that once we have discovered a better way to do something, it’s virtually impossible for us not to do it that way.

We just cannot help developing. It’s part of us and irresistible.

I believe this is one of the most fundamental forces in the universe. I have no good explanation for it’s deepest origin, but I’m convinced it must be embraced.

Decoupling income from work seems to be a good way to do embrace this fundamental force in us, and it also seems possible for the first time in history. I believe we should continue to seriously investigate this possibility. 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,253 other followers